May 20, 2012, 10:25:25 AM
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Maf support.  (Read 1595 times)

Ligo12

  • JACKAL Owner
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Maf support.
« on: March 27, 2011, 07:18:36 PM »
Please.
Logged

John_H

  • JACKAL Owner
  • *
  • Posts: 227
    • 1991
    • Talon TSI AWD
    • Motor: 4G63 2.0L
    • Head: 1G (large ports)
    • Turbo: gt3076r
Re: Maf support.
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2011, 07:54:28 PM »
I agree.

I don't use it right now, but holy crap, that would be amazing for stock/near stock cars.

all of the fuel and timing control with the fps soleniod, idle speeds, WBo2 datalogging etc.

Just change the VE table to "fuel", get rid of the enrichment tables and have a simpler injector setup table.

That would be great for low/med hp setups and the like.

I would FOR SURE use this over an SAFC, MAFT, MAFTPro, etc.  I would use it over the 'Link, AEM EMS etc because of price and ease of use.

I am sure many many people would.

and as much as we all like Jackal, with the MAF in place, the car is a set-it-and-forget-it thing.  Its easy.  No one likes to have to retune all the time on a daily driver, especially if its your wifes car.
Logged

GST95

  • WEREWOLF Owner
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • 92
    • Galant VR-4
    • Motor: 4G63 2.0L
    • Head: 2G (small ports)
    • Turbo: HX40
Re: Maf support.
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2011, 09:20:06 PM »
I also agree that this would be a beneficial option.
Logged

1990talonfast

  • JACKAL Owner
  • *
  • Posts: 147
    • 1990
    • Colt
    • Motor: 4G63 2.0L
    • Head: 1G (large ports)
    • Turbo: EvB16G
Re: Maf support.
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2011, 07:25:55 AM »
I dont see how speed density wouldnt work for low hp setups? I us it and I make less than 300 to the wheels, speed density is fine on my set up.
Logged

GST95

  • WEREWOLF Owner
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • 92
    • Galant VR-4
    • Motor: 4G63 2.0L
    • Head: 2G (small ports)
    • Turbo: HX40
Re: Maf support.
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2011, 07:58:13 PM »
Its not that it wont work on a low hp setup.  Im actually currently running SD on a basically stock car.  I personally think it would be a good idea because it would widen the potential user base of the program.  Not everybody prefers SD or wants to get rid of their maf setup, but wants a nicely designed interface to tune their current setup with.
Logged

John_H

  • JACKAL Owner
  • *
  • Posts: 227
    • 1991
    • Talon TSI AWD
    • Motor: 4G63 2.0L
    • Head: 1G (large ports)
    • Turbo: gt3076r
Re: Maf support.
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2011, 09:43:01 PM »
of course it would work, but its simpler to be able to tune with the MAF in place.

All you have to do is a downpipe and catback, a fuel pump, injectors, intake pipe and filter and then Jackal.

Simple reliable fast fuel eficient, great driving and under a grand.

no headaches, no other sensors, nothing scary.

Plus it would be hands down the best cheap tuning option out there.
Logged
Pages: [1]